The specific availability for this course is not currently known. If you would like to know if this course will be offered during your session, please contact us.
COURSE DESCRIPTION: The course consists of analyzing the processes of economic transition in general, as well as in particular historical instances. The emphasis is laid-but not exclusively-on the central European experience. As a prerequisite for analyzing the dynamics of transition it deals with the workings of non-market economic systems, especially the centrally planned state-managed economies. Topics also include each system's ideological foundations, institutional structure and economic decision-making mechanisms. Each of the competing approaches to transitions is dealt with separately. Theoretical conclusions are supplemented by empirical evidence in the form of case studies. LEARNING OBJECTIVESThe main objective of the course is to provide students with understanding of the working of nonmarket systems and explain the challenges that the economic transition to market capitalism necessarily entails.COURSE MATERIALAlchian, Armen, Property Rights, The Concise Encyclopedia of Economics, http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/PropertyRights.htmlAlesina, Alberto and Drazen, Allan, 1991. “Why are Stabilizations Delayed?” American Economic Review, 81, 1170-1188.Bastiat, Fréderic, What is seen and what is not seen, http://www.econlib.org/library/Bastiat/basEss1.htmlBoettke, Peter J. Calculation and Coordination: Essays on socialism and transitional political economy. New York: Routledge, 2001. http://economics.gmu.edu/pboettke/pubs/CC_REVISES.PDFBoycko, Maxim; Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny, “A Theory of Privatization”, Economic Journal, 106. 309-319.Caplan, Bryan, The Museum of Communism. http://www.gmu.edu/departments/economics/bcaplan/museum/musframe.htmde Soto, Hernando, “Citadels of Dead Capital: What the Third World must learn from U.S. history”, Reason, May 2001.Hardin, Garrett „The Tragedy of the Commons," Science, 162(1968):1243-1248. http://dieoff.org/page95.htmHayek, F.A. “The Use of Knowledge in Society”, The American Economic Review, Vol. 35, No. 4. (Sep., 1945), pp. 519-530.Hellman, Joel, 1998: “Winners Take All: the Politics of Partial Reform,” World Politics, 50, 203-234.Hellman, Joel; Jones, Geraint; and Kaufman, Daniel. “Seize the State, Seize the Day: State Capture, Corruption and Influence in Transition”, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Number 2444, September 2000. Available at: http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/governance/pdf/seize.pdfHuggins, Laura E. and Anderson, Terry, Property Rights: A Practical Guide to Freedom and Prosperity, Hoover Institution, 2003. http://www.hoover.org/publications/books/3009301.html#tocJohnson, Simon; Daniel Kaufmann and Andrei Shleifer, “The Unofficial Economy in Transition”, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1997. pp. 159-239.Kornai, János, “The Soft Budget Constraint”, Kyklos, 39:1 (1986) 3-30.Kornai, János. “What the Change of System From Socialism to Capitalism Does and Does Not Mean”, Journal of Economic Perspectives 14:1 (Winter 2000), 27-42. Available at http://www.economics.harvard.edu/faculty/kornai/papers/wtcosf.pdfMaddison, Angus, The World Economy: A Millennial Perspective, Paris: OECD, 2001.Salerno, Joseph, Why a Socialist Economy is "Impossible", Postscript to Mises, Ludwig von, Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth, Mises Institute, 2001. http://www.mises.org/econcalc/POST.aspShleifer, Andrei et. al. “Tunnelling”, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings, 2000. Available at http://www.economics.harvard.edu/~ashleife/papers/tunnelling.pdfShleifer, Andrei, and Vishny, Robert. “Corruption”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108, 599-617.Tullock, Gordon. “The Transitional Gains Trap”, Bell Journal of Economics, 6:2 (Autumn, 1975), 671-8.COURSE FORMATThe course will be conducted in the form of lectures (2 hours per week) and seminars (2 hours per week). The course also includes students’ presentations and discussions.CLASS PARTICIPATION: Active participation is expected. Mid-term and final tests are based on lectures, assigned literature and on the discussion during seminars. Students are graded on their attendance and contribution to class discussions, group project and on the test results. GROUP PROJECT: At the first session, all students will be assigned group projects to be presented during the seminars. ATTENDANCE Attendance of students is expected. It is a part of students' evaluation. Each session is valued 1 point. The maximum one can get is 20 p. points (there are 26 sessions: lectures and seminars).STUDENT EVALUATIONCourse grade will be determined on the basis of the following: attendance (20 %), team project (30%), mid-term test (20%), final test (30%).COURSE SCHEDULE AND CONTENTWEEK 1: Introduction, relevance of economic systems among causes of economic growth.WEEK 2: Theory and classification of economic systems; Intellectual sources of socialism.WEEK 3: True reality of socialist countries - why economic transformation was requiredWEEK 4: Did socialism have to fail?WEEK 5: Where to go? Economic freedom needed, failures of capitalismWEEK 6: Site visit – RFE/RL.WEEK 7: MidtermWEEK 8: Why institutions matter and how to change themWEEK 9: Overview of Czech transition, price deregulation, trade liberalization.WEEK 10: Privatization.WEEK 11: Fiscal and monetary policy.WEEK 12: Labor market and social policy.WEEK 13: Impact of EU on economic transition.
Download course description here in Acrobat PDF Format Adobe Acrobat Reader is needed to download this file